Skip to main content

Learning Urdu (part 2)

It is now over 2 years since I started to learn Urdu. I have already posted a blog on my initial observations. 

As time has progressed, I am slowly becoming more familiar with the language, and, when I improvise a new sentence, some of my "guesses" prove right. 

One thing to get used to is that "a" is a marker of the masculine singular (in Indo-European languages I am familiar with, it is a marker of feminine singular), "i" is a marker of feminine gender (singular and plural), and "e" is a marker of the masculine plural. 

Urdu verbs seem quite straightforward. In the infinitive, verbs typically end in "na" ("hona" to be, "karna" do to, "sona" to sleep, "sunna" to hear etc.). When conjugating a verb, the root is used with or without an ending, eg "mein kam KARTA hun" means "I am working" where KARTA is the root KAR plus the ending TA to express a habitual present tense. 

Vocabulary is proving quite difficult to memorise as, in many cases, it bears little relation to the Indo-European vocabulary with which I am familiar. There are some familiar words: naam (name), pina (to drink), tum (familiar version of you), kamre (room), and so on. 

As in any language, there are a number of oddities which seem to defy logic or appear unnecessarily complicated. The numbers seem quite complicated and, while they follow a certain pattern, are not self-evident. There appear to be a lot of tenses; I am not sure quite how many as yet. 

Another complication is the writing system, based on that of Arabic. Even the number of letters appears to be fluid, depending on how you count them. It appears there are 39 letters plus 13 extra characters. Not only do the letters change their shape depending on their position in a word; they appear quite different in different typefacse and writing styles. A number of the phonemes (sounds) do not have an equivalent in other familiar Indo-European languages such as retroflexive R, or retroflexive T. The modern way of writing is far easier to decypher than the "hanging" writing known as "nastaliq". 

I have recently discovered a table of pronouns and their declensions which should make it easier to navigate the cases. Urdu has "postpositions" rather than "prepositions", so "You live in London" would be "Aap London MEIN rehete hain." The word MEIN ("in") follows the place it is in, rather than preceeding it. There seem to be a lot of these postpositions. Some of them composite ("the friend is with me" would be "dost aap KE PAS hay" ("friend you with is").

  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Arabic script in order to read Urdu

Since my last post on this blog possibly over a year ago, I have begun studying another language: Urdu.  On 30 June last year our family moved to Bury, Lancashire, where I now serve as minister of Radcliffe Road Baptist Church . Bury is a Lancashire mill town which is now part of Greater Manchester (Mancehster is about 25 minutes by car or tram). A large proportion of the population of Bury are Urdu/Punjabi speakers. I am keen to reach out to them, and have been learning their language with the help of my neighbour and also at least one another acquaintance I have made.  Urdu, as well as its sister language, Hindi, is part of the large Indo-European language family, and is therefore related to English and other more familiar languages such as German and French. For example the numbers (in Urdu: eek, do, teen) are recognisably similar, and there are many common words such as "naam" (name). Having said that, Urdu is quite challenging to learn, especially now that I am far older...
Post a Comment
Read more

Translator's toolbox (post on the constituent elements of translating)

  I have worked as a translator on and off since completing my masters in 1998.  After an extended period during which my translation work was very part-time, in October 2019 I returned to full-time freelance translating work. For the most part my work involves being sent Word files in a foreign language which I 'overtype' (i.e. replace the foreign language text with my English translation). My languages are German, Italian, Russian and French. My areas of expertise include semi-technical legal texts (such as contracts or court rulings) and texts related to detergents (such as patents or reports), as well as all sorts of commercial texts, advertising anything from spas to interfaces for paid parking. One of my niche jobs is translating coding-relating texts for a major social media company.  As I reflect on my work (and try to improve how I do it), I thought it would be useful to break the process of translating down into the constituent activities it involves. Hopef...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unforgettable

The significance of the picture to the right is the saying, "An elephant never forgets." And, indeed, remembering is a big part of language learning . To master a language, a working vocabulary of 2000 words is required. Besides vocabulary, there are also phrases, grammatical endings and constructions to remember. This does take time and effort, both to learn and to be able to retrieve what you have learnt. I want to talk about how to make that effort in a way which is effective, not wasting energy on what will not deliver the result you need. So how do you do it? Let me suggest some ways I have used to remember language . 1. One artificial way of remembering words is to come up with some association . My Hebrew teacher taught us to associate the Hebrew derekh (road) with the name of my current church minister, Derek. The word for yellow in Russian, jolty , sounds like the word for a dayglow jacket ( jilet ). I remember the German for elephant trunk, because it ...
Post a Comment
Read more